<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://aucfreeculture.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aucfreeculture.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Open source developers file the first General Public Liscence law suit in the US by Ossi</title>
		<link>http://aucfreeculture.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/open-source-developers-file-the-first-general-public-liscence-law-suit-in-the-us/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Ossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aucfreeculture.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/open-source-developers-file-the-first-general-public-liscence-law-suit-in-the-us/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Interesting post, thanks. Just wanted to point out one inaccuracy. You say that:

&quot;the terms of the license dictate that the user of such software is required to allow others access to the source code of whatever you have developed based on the aforementioned software.&quot;

That is not totally inaccurate. You only need to disclose the source if you _distribute_ what you have developed. Thus companies are free to modify GPL code without disclosing it if is for internal use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Interesting post, thanks. Just wanted to point out one inaccuracy. You say that:</p>
<p>&#8220;the terms of the license dictate that the user of such software is required to allow others access to the source code of whatever you have developed based on the aforementioned software.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is not totally inaccurate. You only need to disclose the source if you _distribute_ what you have developed. Thus companies are free to modify GPL code without disclosing it if is for internal use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Software Freedom Day! Get your free CDs. by Mohamed Selim</title>
		<link>http://aucfreeculture.wordpress.com/2007/09/15/happy-software-freedom-day-get-your-free-cds/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed Selim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aucfreeculture.wordpress.com/2007/09/15/happy-software-freedom-day-get-your-free-cds/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Way to go Hani ;)
and happy software freedom day to u :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Hani <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
and happy software freedom day to u <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
